From http://stopforeclosurefraud.com:

A nonholder in possession, however, cannot rely on possession of the instrument alone as a basis to enforce it. The transferee’s right to enforce the instrument derives from the transferor (because by the terms of the instrument, it is not payable to the transferee) and therefore those rights must be proved.

Com. Law § 3-203 cmt. 2; accord Leavings v. Mills 175 S.W.3d 301 (Tex. Ct. App. 2004 ) (“A person not identified in a note who is seeking to enforce it as the owner or holder must prove the transfer by which he acquired the note.”)

The transferee does not enjoy the statutorily provided assumption of the right to enforce the instrument that accompanies a negotiated instrument, and so the transferee “must account for possession of the unindorsed instrument by proving the transaction through which the transferee acquired it.” Com. Law § 3-203 cmt. 2.

If there are multiple prior transfers, the transferee must prove each prior transfer. U.S. Bank Nat’l Assoc. v. Ibanez, 941 N.E.2d 40, 53 (Mass. 2011) (citing In re Parrish, 326 B.R. 708, 720 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2005)). Once the transferee establishes a successful transfer from a holder, he or she acquires the enforcement rights of that holder. See Com. Law § 3-203 cmt. 2.

A transferee’s rights, however, can be no greater than his or her transferor’s because those rights are “purely derivative.” Lawrence, supra, § 3-203:15R. Thus, the Substitute Trustees here, who possess an unindorsed note and wish to enforce it, had the burden of proving their status as nonholder in possession.

View the order here:

Maryland-Requires-Full-Proof-Note-Transfer-Anderson-v-Burson

Now the question is, why won't the York County and PA Middle District Courts in Pennsylvania acknowledge this and so many other flaws in the fraudulent foreclosure complaint filed by Grenen & Birsic in an effort to steal the home from an American citizen who has tried to prove his numerous findings of fraud verified with expert witness affidavits and testimony for the past 13 years?

Attorney Kristine M. Anthou was caught on more than one occasion perjuring herself under oath.  They won't even give this man the right to a hearing to cross examine.  What dirty secrets and crimes are these courts and Grenen & Birsic trying to hide and keep out of the public eye in Pennsylvania?  Is this another case of trying to silence the whistleblower so they can continue perpetrating their fraud in Pennsylvania against 1000's of other homeowners?

EMC Mortgage had to pay $28 Million to Settle FTC Charges of Unlawful Mortgage Servicing and Debt Collection Practices, the same EMC that is trying to steal the Conklin home in Pennsylvania with the help of Grenen & Birsic.  This is outright tyranny!