The case of EMC Mortgage (represented by Grenen & Birsic) against Stephen Conklin continues to be brought to our attention as many people have come forth presenting evidence of the alleged fraud being perpetrated by EMC, Grenen & Birsic, York County Courthouse, and the Federal Courthouse for the Middle District of Pennsylvania.
We’ve recently received a Letter of Opinion from Janus Document Examiner / Handwriting Analyst that seems to verify the claims of fraudulent paperwork Mr. Conklin has alleged over the years, and we are presenting that for review.
Letter of Opinion:
At the request of Stephen G. Conklin and his team, documents were examined on Case #2006-SU 433-406 regarding a mortgage on his house and land at 100 Spangler Road, Lewisberry, Pennsylvania 17339.
It was requested that all documents pertaining tot he mortgage be examined for authenticity in the York County Judicial Center on November 6, 2009 at 2:30 in the afternoon.
Several irregularities must be noted. The exhibit A- Description of Property was continuously used in two different assignments of mortgage. They are exactly alike. Both are photocopies of the same assignment.
Irregular forms were noted. There was also a letter from Reality Settlement Services of York, Inc. regarding property 185 Central View Road, Dillsburg, Pennsylvania 17019. The Reality agency admits cutting and pasting a document with Stephen Conklin’s signature to create a settlement sheet to rush a mortgage settlement. This document should no doubt have been in another file, but the same realty settlement services company was also participating in this case. (April 8, 1997 Settlement Services of York, Inc., signed by Dara D. Grimm)
A third irregularity was that there were no Allonge Settlement Cover sheets on the mortgage transfer paperwork. None were affixed to the transfer paperwork, which is customary in such transactions.
The documents themselves, the promissory note, and the assignment of mortgage, dates May 15, 1997 were photocopies. In the process of filing these documents, the promissory note and the assignment of mortgage, numbers were red stamped on the face of the documents. This defacement of an official document renders it altered.
It is my conclusion that these are not officially acceptable originals for a legitimate transaction. There are questionable irregularities as well to consider.
Respectfully Submitted,
Jan Leach
Forensic Document Examiner
Janus Handwriting Notarized Letter of Opinion
You may contact Jan Leach at the website below if you would like your own Forensic Document Examinations.
http://www.janusdocumentexamination.com/
Loading ...